You're navigating design conflicts with engineers. How can you secure a compromise that works for everyone?

Understanding the holistic and importance of the final goal is important. Respect each other’s expertise in their field and be open to hear each other’s views. Good teamwork produces better outcomes and work satisfaction.

I believe in the Harvard principle of compromise: to question why something is the way it is, to fully understand it, and then to find a solution that addresses all the challenges involved.Instead of cutting the orange in half and giving each person a portion, it's better to ask why they need it. One person might need just the peel for baking a cake, while the other might want the fruit to make orange juice. In this case, the best approach is to give each person 100% of what they need, rather than compromising with a 50/50 split that doesn't fully satisfy either.

Take in to account everyone's opinions, but don't get stuck on iterating on the same ideas over and over again when nothing is working. It's easy to go down a rabbit hole once one idea is given. Have others bring in ideas that someone might not have thought of before. Have the group be creative during brainstorming sessions. You never know what designs a group can come across when everyone is open minded.

- Diseño Apto para todos los gustos. - No traicionar el ADN de marca del pasado hacia el futuro. - Avanzar en innovación y nuevas tecnologías con pie firme pero sin olvidar la premisa de la sencillez y confiabiabilidad al usuario.

You must understand goals between all the teams involves in the projects. I agree with the fact that : Designers aim to create a visually appealing product that resonates with consumers, while engineers are focused on functionality, safety, and manufacturability. It's essential to acknowledge these objectives and discuss how they can be aligned. By doing so, you create a foundation for collaboration where each party appreciates the other's expertise and contribution to the project.

Communication is the Key of the greatnest of a team I share the same opinion on this articles : You must articulate your design vision while being open to technical constraints presented by engineers. This involves active listening, asking questions, and being willing to adapt your design to accommodate engineering needs without compromising its integrity. Encouraging an environment where feedback is constructive and solutions-oriented can lead to innovative compromises that satisfy both design and engineering.

For digital ideas and electronics, having a proof of concept and a functioning prototype is a major advantage. It not only validates your concept but also boosts confidence in your design. Be creative in your approach and ensure that your prototype is clear and easy to understand. This tangible demonstration can effectively communicate your idea and its potential, making it easier for others to grasp and support your vision.

Limit your options to a maximum of 3, and never more than 7. Providing too many choices can overwhelm clients and hinder decision-making. They rely on your expertise to guide them to the best solution.

When developing a product concept, certain aspects and details define its character and make a difference. Successful design requires logically prioritizing these elements. Sometimes, aesthetics take precedence due to a decision that’s both logical and emotional; other times, it’s the surface finish or the display resolution in an interface that becomes the focus. It all depends on what you want the product to achieve. This might seem paradoxical, but it's the essence and art of industrial design.

It's important to prioritize fracture. I share the same opinion : Determine which design elements are non-negotiable and which engineering constraints are critical. This will help identify where compromises can be made without diluting the design's essence or compromising the vehicle's performance. By setting clear priorities, you ensure that both teams work towards a shared vision, focusing their efforts on what matters most.

Just like with knives in the kitchen, where each one is designed for a specific task—paring, slicing, chopping, etc. CAD systems are specialized tools. - **Revit and solidworks** might be preferred for mechanical design due to its intuitive interface and strong capabilities in parametric modeling. - **AutoCAD** is often favored for 2D drafting and general-purpose design due to its versatility and widespread use. - **Rhino** might be the go-to for industrial design Rhino's versatility, especially with its NURBS (Non-Uniform Rational B-Splines) modeling, makes it an excellent choice for industries requiring precise and complex surface modeling, such as industrial design, automotive, and especially naval architecture.

I once had the honor of meeting Dieter Rams in person in Pasadena, California. Curious about the secret behind his success, I asked him what had made him so successful. Holding my hand and looking me in the eye with great humility, he replied, "Look, I wasn't the best, I was good. I just had the chance to work at the right time with the right people." It's rare to hear such words from someone so accomplished. This encounter reminded me how truly precious it is to meet the right person at the right time—it can make all the difference in one's journey.